Workew

In downtown Toronto, a gleaming corporate tower still carries the trappings of twentieth-century office life: desks lined with monitors, meeting rooms lit by fluorescent panels, the muted hum of HVAC systems. Yet, on a Tuesday afternoon, more than half the workstations are empty. Employees are scattered across Canada, Mexico, and India, linked by an invisible web of AI-powered tools that transcribe, summarize, translate, and coordinate in real time. What was once a symbol of economic vitality—the bustling office floor—now feels more like a staging ground for occasional gatherings.

This image is becoming increasingly common across global business hubs. The latest research suggests it may also be a glimpse of the future. A new survey of 2,500 employees and IT leaders across ten countries, conducted by GoTo and Workplace Intelligence, reveals a striking reality: 51% of workers now believe artificial intelligence will eventually eliminate the need for traditional office spaces. Even more telling, 62% say they would prefer AI-enabled remote work over the office, and 71% expect AI to deliver greater flexibility and balance in their daily lives.

For executives grappling with hybrid models, this shift signals something deeper than a simple preference for remote work. It suggests that the very notion of the office—the cultural anchor of corporate life for more than a century—is being questioned.

A Statistical Portrait of Shifting Expectations

The report paints a picture of workers not just accepting AI, but expecting it to enable a new architecture of work. 66% of employees say AI allows them to be productive from anywhere, while 65% believe it improves their ability to serve customers remotely. To many, the technology has already become the scaffolding that holds hybrid models together: the always-on assistant that bridges time zones, records institutional knowledge, and reduces the friction of distance.

The numbers also reveal the uneven ways in which different generations perceive AI’s promise. Among Gen Z workers—the first digital-native generation—90% believe AI makes remote work more productive. Millennials follow closely behind at 84%. By contrast, only 71% of Gen X and 74% of Baby Boomers share this optimism. While the majority in every cohort sees value in AI, younger employees are clearly more enthusiastic.

This divergence matters. As younger generations enter management and leadership roles, their comfort with AI-enabled flexibility could accelerate the decline of office centrality. For Baby Boomers, who came of age when the office was both a professional proving ground and social fabric, the shift may feel disorienting. For digital natives, it feels inevitable.

Why the Office Once Mattered

To understand the significance of this moment, it’s worth recalling why the office became dominant in the first place. The industrial revolution pulled workers into centralized locations where machinery, paperwork, and managers could be concentrated. Over time, the office took on cultural weight: a place where careers were forged, corporate identities reinforced, and innovation catalyzed by proximity.

Even as technology eroded the necessity of physical presence—first with telephones, then with email and video conferencing—the office retained its symbolic power. It was not just a place of work, but a stage for ambition, collaboration, and corporate ritual.

AI, however, threatens to redraw this balance in ways that video calls never could. Where Zoom connected faces, AI stitches together workflows. Where Slack enabled messaging, AI organizes knowledge and anticipates needs. By embedding intelligence into the infrastructure of work, AI reduces the costs of distance to near zero. In doing so, it destabilizes the office’s monopoly on productivity.

Case Studies: AI Already Reshaping Industries

The abstract promise of AI becomes more concrete when viewed through industry-specific examples. Healthcare offers one of the clearest illustrations. In hospitals and clinics, paperwork has long been a silent thief of time, consuming hours of doctors’ and nurses’ days. OntarioMD, a subsidiary of the Ontario Medical Association, reports that AI scribe technology now reduces this administrative burden by 70 to 90%. What was once a relentless ritual of forms and charts has been replaced by natural language systems that transcribe consultations, generate summaries, and file records instantly. The implications are profound: doctors spend more time with patients, health systems increase capacity, and burnout is reduced.

Financial services are also undergoing a quiet transformation. Compliance teams, once reliant on armies of analysts to comb through transactions, now use AI copilots to detect anomalies and flag risks in real time. Investment managers lean on machine learning to process regulatory filings and macroeconomic data, allowing them to anticipate shifts faster than human-only teams ever could. Meanwhile, client service departments deploy AI chatbots that can not only answer routine queries but increasingly deliver empathetic, personalized communication. Where human agents once struggled to maintain consistency across time zones, AI provides round-the-clock, culturally attuned support.

Retail and customer service sectors provide a glimpse of AI’s expanding emotional intelligence. Recent studies have found that AI systems outperform trained professionals in delivering compassionate and empathetic communication at scale. For executives, this suggests that AI is not simply automating rote tasks, but redefining the frontier of customer experience. The question shifts from what jobs will AI replace to what new forms of value can AI create.

These examples underscore why employees across industries increasingly view AI as a prerequisite for effective work, not just an optional upgrade.

The Leader-Employee Disconnect

Yet the path to adoption is not frictionless. The GoTo and Workplace Intelligence report uncovers a critical disconnect between IT leaders and the employees they serve. 91% of IT executives believe their organizations use AI effectively to support remote and hybrid work. Only 53% of employees agree.

This gap reveals a structural challenge. Leaders, responsible for strategy and infrastructure, often see the potential of AI in aggregate—reduced costs, smoother processes, enhanced security. Employees, however, judge success by daily experience: Does AI make my work easier? Does it free me from repetitive tasks? Does it help me perform better in front of clients or patients?

When the answers fall short, skepticism grows. Employees may perceive AI as a managerial imposition rather than an empowering tool. This divergence is not new—every technological leap, from the typewriter to enterprise software, has faced cultural resistance. But AI raises the stakes, because it affects not only tasks but identity. For a nurse, a lawyer, or a financial advisor, the line between “what I do” and “what the machine does” can feel existential.

Executives must therefore bridge this gap deliberately. AI rollouts that succeed tend to combine technical investment with cultural investment: clear communication, visible support, and training that emphasizes augmentation rather than replacement. The lesson is straightforward but often overlooked—adoption is as much about trust as it is about technology.

Strategic Implications for the Office and Real Estate

The implications extend beyond technology departments to the very core of corporate strategy. If employees are right that AI reduces the need for physical offices, then boards and CFOs will eventually face hard choices about real estate.

For decades, headquarters were symbols of prestige, often located in prime districts that conveyed permanence and scale. But as more employees conclude they are more productive elsewhere, the equation changes. Nearly two-thirds of workers in the survey believe companies should prioritize AI investments over in-office perks. This is a startling shift in priorities: gym memberships, gourmet cafeterias, and rooftop lounges may be less persuasive than an AI assistant that helps close a deal or resolve a customer complaint.

Commercial real estate markets are already feeling tremors. Vacancy rates in major cities like San Francisco, London, and Toronto remain well above pre-pandemic levels, with hybrid models reducing daily foot traffic. If AI accelerates the adoption of remote-first models, the demand for sprawling headquarters could decline further. For landlords, the risk is structural: tenants may never return to pre-2020 occupancy patterns.

But offices are unlikely to vanish entirely. Instead, their purpose may shift. Rather than default work locations, they may evolve into cultural hubs—spaces designed for creativity, onboarding, and strategic alignment. AI, paradoxically, could make offices both less necessary day to day and more valuable as occasional gathering places. For executives, the challenge will be deciding how much square footage is justified for this new role.

The Global Divide in AI Adoption

The enthusiasm for AI is not distributed evenly across the globe. The GoTo study highlighted Canadian workers’ relatively low confidence and literacy in AI compared with peers abroad, a finding echoed in KPMG’s analysis. This gap suggests not only cultural hesitation but also structural weaknesses in workforce readiness. Canada, like much of Europe, has invested heavily in regulatory oversight and ethical frameworks, but less in large-scale workforce training.

By contrast, Asian economies—particularly India and parts of Southeast Asia—are leapfrogging into AI-driven work models. Indian IT services firms, already veterans of remote delivery, are embedding AI copilots into their workflows at speed. In cities like Bangalore and Hyderabad, teams rely on AI not only to automate coding tasks but also to enhance project management across global clients. The result is a workforce that is not merely using AI but internalizing it as a core element of professional life.

The United States, meanwhile, sits in a paradoxical position. Its companies lead in AI innovation, but workforce adoption remains uneven. Silicon Valley firms like Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI set the pace for technology, yet many mid-sized American companies lag in integration, constrained by legacy systems or cultural resistance. For U.S. executives, the challenge is less about access and more about scaling adoption across diverse industries and geographies.

Europe’s trajectory is shaped by regulation. The EU’s AI Act, designed to ensure ethical deployment, may slow adoption in the short term but could produce more sustainable trust in the long run. German and Swiss firms, known for precision and caution, are adopting AI incrementally, often in tightly regulated sectors like manufacturing and banking. While this may appear conservative, it could yield long-term advantages in resilience and compliance.

Policy and Regulation: Shaping the AI Workplace

Policy frameworks are not peripheral; they are central to how AI reshapes work. In Asia, governments are positioning AI as a driver of economic development, offering tax incentives and funding for AI skilling programs. In India, the government’s “Digital India” initiative explicitly integrates AI into education and workforce development, seeking to train millions in AI literacy by the end of the decade.

Contrast this with North America, where regulatory frameworks are fragmented. In Canada, provinces set their own rules, creating a patchwork of standards that slows nationwide adoption. In the U.S., Congress has yet to pass comprehensive AI legislation, leaving corporations to navigate a regulatory vacuum. For multinationals, this creates complexity: a tool that is legal in California may face restrictions in the EU, while data privacy rules in Canada differ again.

For executives, the strategic implication is clear: global corporations must design AI strategies that are both adaptive and modular. What works in Bangalore may not be permissible in Berlin. Navigating this landscape requires not only technological investment but also policy fluency.

From Productivity Enhancer to Transformative Superpower

If the global landscape sets the pace, strategic vision determines the trajectory. McKinsey, in a report published earlier this year, argued that companies must see AI not merely as a productivity enhancer but as a “transformative superpower.” This framing is provocative, but it captures a critical truth: the firms that integrate AI deeply into their culture and strategy will redefine competitive advantage.

At the most basic level, AI enhances productivity. A salesperson who once spent hours updating a CRM can now rely on AI to automate entries. A lawyer who once combed through case files can receive instant summaries. But the deeper opportunity lies in reimagining processes from the ground up. AI enables companies to break free from traditional constraints—time zones, language barriers, bureaucratic friction—and rebuild workflows around speed, scale, and personalization.

Consider a multinational with teams in São Paulo, Munich, and Bangalore. Before AI, coordination across these sites was limited by geography, cultural differences, and time delays. With AI-powered translation, summarization, and scheduling, those barriers collapse. The organization can operate as if it were a single, fluid entity.

For leaders, the question is not whether AI boosts productivity, but whether they can harness it to solve larger challenges: innovating faster, reducing inequities, enhancing resilience in supply chains, or creating entirely new markets. Those who view AI as infrastructure—as essential as electricity or broadband—will be the ones to capture these advantages.

Risks, Resistance, and Blind Spots

The road, however, is not without obstacles. Employee resistance remains a formidable challenge, rooted less in technological skepticism than in existential fear. Workers worry not just about job loss but about surveillance. AI systems that monitor keystrokes, analyze communication patterns, or predict attrition risk creating a culture of mistrust. The danger is that tools designed to empower workers become instruments of control.

Regulatory risks loom as well. Data privacy rules are tightening globally, and missteps can result in both reputational damage and financial penalties. Companies must also contend with the risk of “digital burnout.” AI can accelerate productivity to such a degree that employees feel pressured to match machine-like efficiency, leading to exhaustion rather than empowerment.

These risks underscore a paradox: AI’s promise of freedom and flexibility can backfire if not managed responsibly. For executives, success will require not only investment but also restraint—deploying AI in ways that enhance human agency rather than diminish it.

The Future of the Office: From Necessity to Symbol

The most radical implication of AI-enabled work is not that offices will disappear, but that their purpose will change. For more than a century, offices were synonymous with work itself. They were where careers were launched, promotions earned, and cultures defined. They were also spaces of surveillance—visible proof of effort in an age when presence was equated with productivity.

AI disrupts that equation. With workflows automated, knowledge captured, and collaboration tools available at any hour, physical presence is no longer the anchor of productivity. Instead, the office is evolving into something closer to a cultural hub: a place to reinforce identity, build trust, and spark creativity. Its role shifts from operational necessity to strategic resource.

This evolution is already visible. Some technology firms are shrinking their footprints but redesigning remaining space around collaboration, not cubicles. Financial institutions, once symbols of corporate formality, are experimenting with flexible spaces that resemble university campuses more than trading floors. Even law firms—traditionally among the most conservative—are rethinking the balance between private offices and collective areas.

Real Estate and Urban Consequences

The consequences for commercial real estate are profound. Vacancy rates in cities like San Francisco, New York, and London remain well above pre-pandemic norms, and many landlords are confronting the uncomfortable reality that demand may never fully recover. AI, by making remote work more productive and reliable, accelerates this trend.

Urban centers could face ripple effects. Coffee shops, restaurants, and gyms that once thrived on office foot traffic may struggle. Transit systems designed around daily commutes could see permanent reductions in ridership. At the same time, secondary cities and suburban hubs could benefit as talent disperses more widely.

Some real estate investors see opportunity in conversion. Empty office towers in North America are being reimagined as residential spaces, laboratories, or co-working hubs. If the office of the future is less about permanence and more about flexibility, then the real estate industry must adapt accordingly. For executives, this raises strategic questions about capital allocation: is a landmark headquarters still worth the investment, or should resources be redirected toward digital infrastructure and AI adoption?

The Cultural Evolution of Work

The shift is not only physical but cultural. For decades, ambition was often measured by visibility in the office—the late nights, the corner office, the symbolic parking space. In an AI-enabled workplace, ambition is increasingly measured by outcomes. Productivity is visible not through hours logged but through impact delivered.

This cultural reorientation may prove the most lasting change. Workers, especially younger cohorts, increasingly view flexibility as a right, not a perk. They value autonomy, balance, and meaningful work over physical presence. AI amplifies these expectations by making remote productivity not only possible but superior in many cases.

For leaders, this creates both opportunity and risk. Opportunity, because flexibility expands access to talent pools worldwide. Risk, because culture is harder to sustain when teams are distributed. Offices once served as crucibles of culture, where norms were reinforced through osmosis. Without physical presence, culture must be engineered with intention.

Conclusion: AI as the New Infrastructure of Work

The rise of AI does not signal the death of the office, but it does mark the end of its monopoly. Where once the office was the default, it is now optional. Where once it was the center of productivity, it is now a hub for connection. The shift is not binary—offices will not vanish overnight—but structural. The primacy of flexibility, enabled by AI, is becoming the new foundation of work.

Executives face a pivotal choice. They can treat AI as a tool, layering it onto existing workflows while clinging to legacy models of presence. Or they can treat AI as infrastructure, on par with electricity or broadband—something so foundational it reshapes how organizations are designed, how employees are supported, and how value is created.

The stakes are high. Companies that embrace AI as a core part of the employee experience will redefine what it means to be productive, connected, and collaborative. Those that resist risk alienating talent, misallocating capital, and falling behind competitors who operate without the friction of geography.

The office will endure, but in diminished form—less a factory of productivity, more a stage for culture. The true work will happen wherever employees are, powered by AI systems that make distance irrelevant. In this new architecture of work, the winners will be those who recognize that flexibility is not a concession but a competitive advantage.

AI is not just a productivity enhancer. It is a structural force reshaping the social contract between employers and employees. The office may not disappear, but its dominance has already slipped. What rises in its place is a new paradigm: borderless, flexible, remote, and AI-enabled. Leaders who embrace this reality will not only shape the future of their organizations, but also redefine the very fabric of global business.

Remote Work